I can’t believe it has already been a week and a half at Hacker School. Wow. 12 weeks seems like a lot but the time is already flying by.
Today, I decided to resume my studies in Haskell. I worked on the week 11 assignment for Brent Yorgey’s Haskell course. I continued working with the Parser
data type, implementing some utilies and several new Parsers.
This is where I was introduced to *>
and <*
and the concept of lifting in functional programming (which I am still having a hard time fully understanding).
Described in the source for module Control.Applicative
as:
1 2 3 

and
1 2 3 

Using some examples I worked out by hand:
1


I understood this computation as first:
1 2 

The " "
, the result, is disregarded. We pass on “345” to the next call:
1 2 

Since we are ignoring the result of runParser spaces " 345"
, the final result is:
1


Using the same inputs, but for <*
this time:
1


First we run:
1 2 

This time, we don’t disregard " "
.
We pass on “345”:
1 2 

Here we are ignoring 345
, the result of runParser posInt "345"
.
The final result ends up being:
1


Cool, how about one more.
1


1 2 

We keep "hello"
and pass on " 345"
.
1 2 

Uh oh. We got Nothing
. There is no state for us to use in the return Maybe
tuple, so we end up with Nothing
.
posInt :: Parser Integer
: Checks for positive integers in String input.spaces :: Parser String
: Checks for spaces in String input.ident :: Parser String
: an identiļ¬er can be any nonempty sequence of letters and digits, except that it may not start with a digit.
I got this far in my understanding of these functions, but I still do not quite understand what is being “lifted” behind the scenes.
Lifting in the case of (a > b) > f a > f b
is defined in LYaH as “a function that takes a function and returns a new function that’s just like the old one, only it takes a functor as a parameter and returns a functor as the result.” I will mull this over more tonight, and perhaps ask Alan or some alumni in Zulip tomorrow if I am still having a hard time understanding the concept.
For about 30 minutes, I worked through the first six problems of 99 Haskell Problems. It’s been pretty fun to revist things I learned a while back now that I am getting wrapped up in the intricacies of Haskell. My brain feels like it is exploding all the time.
Learning Haskell has been challenging. It is definitely rewarding, but there are many times when I feel discouraged because I don’t know when I will understand things like Applicative Functors like the back of my hand. I often feel afraid that I won’t ever understand these things, but then I tell myself, what’s the rush?